JKR, nooooooo >:
Mar. 23rd, 2018 03:02 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Literally on Tuesday night when I couldn’t sleep I wrote a post about this theory I have about Sectumsempra and Harry’s reaction to it, and then before I could post it I saw this and now I have way too much of a sour taste in my mouth.
The sexism in Labour (and the left in general) is a problem but you know what’s NOT a solution? Attacking women for being women. Refusing to hate some of the most vulnerable women around or call them “men in dresses” doesn’t make you non-feminist. That’s really the opposite of true.
To be clear: I don’t think JKR is some frothing-at-the-mouth queer-hater. I don’t really follow the JKR #discourse but I’ve never seen her do anything I’d describe as queerbaiting. I do think she’s shown time and again (the Native American stuff, the Dumbledore stuff etc) that she is basically the platonic ideal of a certain kind of middle-class white liberal - well-meaning, kind, but ignorant and unwilling to learn.
I thought she might’ve got better on trans stuff; I saw a criticism of her for having deleted old transphobic tweets, and I don’t know the story there, but my immediate assumption at the time was that she’d said transphobic stuff and learnt better. That would be a GOOD thing. Apparently not so much.
There’s been this really scary rise in transphobic stuff in the papers here in the UK, in the last couple of years, particularly in uncritical reporting of TERFs doing a publicity tour attacking trans women and the myth of kids getting gender-confirmation surgery. The Tories have tried using trans people as human shields in updating the Gender Recognition Act - basically our right-wing leading party plans to make it possible for people to legally transition without medical requirements. Which is fantastic, if probably coming out of a desire to showcase the fluffier side of a party that’s been recently investigated for human rights abuses by the UN over their cuts to disabled people’s benefits. But it’s also unleashed a tsunami of transphobia on the left, and made a bunch of TERFs way more relevant and able to get publicity.
JKR hates Corbyn but she’s absolutely a Labour voice, and a relatively prominent one. Certainly she’s a celebrity who takes a definite interest in party politics as well as more general causes. This is probably the most minor way she could indicate a side but it really, really sucks seeing her back this kind of ‘supporting trans women is misogyny’ bullshit :(
The sexism in Labour (and the left in general) is a problem but you know what’s NOT a solution? Attacking women for being women. Refusing to hate some of the most vulnerable women around or call them “men in dresses” doesn’t make you non-feminist. That’s really the opposite of true.
To be clear: I don’t think JKR is some frothing-at-the-mouth queer-hater. I don’t really follow the JKR #discourse but I’ve never seen her do anything I’d describe as queerbaiting. I do think she’s shown time and again (the Native American stuff, the Dumbledore stuff etc) that she is basically the platonic ideal of a certain kind of middle-class white liberal - well-meaning, kind, but ignorant and unwilling to learn.
I thought she might’ve got better on trans stuff; I saw a criticism of her for having deleted old transphobic tweets, and I don’t know the story there, but my immediate assumption at the time was that she’d said transphobic stuff and learnt better. That would be a GOOD thing. Apparently not so much.
There’s been this really scary rise in transphobic stuff in the papers here in the UK, in the last couple of years, particularly in uncritical reporting of TERFs doing a publicity tour attacking trans women and the myth of kids getting gender-confirmation surgery. The Tories have tried using trans people as human shields in updating the Gender Recognition Act - basically our right-wing leading party plans to make it possible for people to legally transition without medical requirements. Which is fantastic, if probably coming out of a desire to showcase the fluffier side of a party that’s been recently investigated for human rights abuses by the UN over their cuts to disabled people’s benefits. But it’s also unleashed a tsunami of transphobia on the left, and made a bunch of TERFs way more relevant and able to get publicity.
JKR hates Corbyn but she’s absolutely a Labour voice, and a relatively prominent one. Certainly she’s a celebrity who takes a definite interest in party politics as well as more general causes. This is probably the most minor way she could indicate a side but it really, really sucks seeing her back this kind of ‘supporting trans women is misogyny’ bullshit :(
no subject
Date: 2018-03-23 04:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2018-03-23 10:48 am (UTC)I don't know about JKR specifically. l tend to think she's flawed and prone to mistakes (like all of us) but decent. That's about as much as I expect of anyone, really :)
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2018-03-23 09:10 pm (UTC)This is how I see her as well. It's not malice as much as ignorance, but because she is such a prominent and powerful public figure, her ignorance can cause a lot of damage. She's a lot like Joss Whedon, I think: they were both praised for their progressiveness and hailed as feminist heroes, and I think JKR like Whedon started to believe her own hype, becoming totally ignorant of her own flaws and prejudices.
(the "I am a good person. Good people don't do bad things. Therefore everything I do is good." fallacy)
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2018-03-24 08:46 pm (UTC)I think this is probably pretty spot on. Good to see that she's gone out publicly to say that it was a mistake, though, the liking. Even if it's not the exact truth, it at the very least sends out a message that she understands it was wrong and hopefully won't do it again. I'm also rather disappointed at her aggressive anti-Corbyn stance, though - the rise of corbynism is one of the most heartening movements I've seen in western politics for ages :/
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2018-03-25 11:41 pm (UTC)Yeah, I don't follow much of JKR but she's definitely struck me a lot like that in the past? Her continued quipping about HP canon and what have you kind of always carried that sort of tone.
I don't think she'd do things out of malice or spite, but I'd be willing to bet it was more out of ignorance in that she hasn't considered the larger scope of the statement, or how much impact she now has without being a strict politician.